Roadfly.com         Roadfly Home | Features | Car Review Videos | Car Reviews | Cars For Sale | Used Car Parts Classifieds | Forum | Car Review Archives | Forum Archives Index



PDA



RussB
09-09-2004, 02:51 PM
Anyone using a dry sump on an S14, prefer a 2.5L?

I am interested in the advantages/disadvantages and outcomes of using the system on an S14.

ThanksRuss
2.5L 88M3
SCCA SFR-Sacto
Street Mod #3

dallasbboy
09-10-2004, 02:16 PM
Here some information about dry sump conversion from a local shop I use here in San Diego.


Dry Sump kit for S14 (http://www.apexengineering.com/catalog/product_info.php/products_id/125?osCsid=9669949fdf4cde7a2dd084c44b323013)

dallasbboy
09-10-2004, 03:54 PM
Dry sump theory here (http://auto.howstuffworks.com/question331.htm)

Dry sump systems have several important advantages over wet sumps:

* Because a dry sump does not need to have an oil pan big enough to hold the oil under the engine, the main mass of the engine can be placed lower in the vehicle. This helps lower the center of gravity and can also help aerodynamics (by allowing a lower hoodline).

* The oil capacity of a dry sump can be as big as you want. The tank holding the oil can be placed anywhere on the vehicle.

* In a wet sump, turning, braking and acceleration can cause the oil to pool on one side of the engine. This sloshing can dip the crankshaft into the oil as it turns or uncover the pump's pick-up tube.

* Excess oil around the crankshaft in a wet sump can get on the shaft and cut horsepower. Some people claim improvements of as much as 15 horsepower by switching to a dry sump.

The disadvantage of the dry sump is the increased weight, complexity and cost from the extra pump and the tank -- but that's a small price to pay for such big benefits!

saltykracker
09-12-2004, 05:19 PM
All motorcycles use dry sump, they can't afford to lose the hp through the frictional dip.


Roadfly Home | Car Reviews | Forum Archives Index