Results 1 to 19 of 19
06-14-2004 01:33 PM #1
- Newark, DE, United StatesMember No: 66953
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Rep Power
On BMW being disqualified from Canadian GP:
1- F1 rightfully claims to be the high-tech version of motorsport, with the "best and brightest" engineers & mechanics. That being said, how is it possible that nobody was smart enough to either understand the technical regulations regarding brake ducts and/or to properly measure the ducts and compare the results to the regulation? Seems to me someone ought to be "make redundant" (as the Brits say) over this.
2- From what I read, the ducts were not "oversize", only located in a manner that was illegal as provided for the the technical regs. Does this mean Williams-BWM and Toyota were disqualified for a rules violation that did not give them a material advantage? If so, it would seem the "penalty does not fit the crime."
3- If the situation outlined in #3 is in fact true (technical violation that did not provide a material advantage) what do you suppose would have happend had Ferrari been similarly caught?
02'M36 Speed, 1/02 Build
Alpine White/Imola Red Leather
"Life is too short not to drive an ///M"
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)